ops: Widen validate-check for upstream/write/rate failures #47

Merged

linus merged 1 commit from ops/validate-check-upstream-failures into develop

2026-09-07 19:53:37 +00:00

Ghost commented

2026-09-07 19:52:02 +00:00

Why

make validate-check already answered "is it caching?" via hit/miss, but ignored upstream_errors / cache_write_failures / rate_limited, so a hot failure path could look fine when hits exist.

What

Widen the highlight grep in make validate-check to include those three fields
Document them in README Quick check (and a one-line note under Inspecting the Result)

Test

Inspected Makefile target + README Quick check table
Fields already emitted by /metrics (steamcache/metrics/metrics.go); no new metrics stack

Risks / rollback

Docs + Makefile only. Revert commit.

Closes #34

## Why `make validate-check` already answered "is it caching?" via hit/miss, but ignored `upstream_errors` / `cache_write_failures` / `rate_limited`, so a hot failure path could look fine when hits exist. ## What - Widen the highlight grep in `make validate-check` to include those three fields - Document them in README Quick check (and a one-line note under Inspecting the Result) ## Test - Inspected Makefile target + README Quick check table - Fields already emitted by `/metrics` (`steamcache/metrics/metrics.go`); no new metrics stack ## Risks / rollback Docs + Makefile only. Revert commit. Closes #34

Ghost added 1 commit

2026-09-07 19:52:02 +00:00

ops: Widen validate-check for upstream/write/rate failures

CI / vulncheck (pull_request) Successful in 15s

Details

CI / check-and-test (pull_request) Successful in 41s

Details

144a68dcd7

Surface upstream_errors, cache_write_failures, and rate_limited in
make validate-check highlights and Quick check docs so a hot failure
path cannot look fine when hits exist.

Closes #34

Ghost requested reviews from eva, linus

2026-09-07 19:52:02 +00:00